The last section
of Night cannot be described with any
adjective. In fact, there is no adjective that can accurately describe the
accounts of Elie Wiesel’s life. No word would do it justice. After reading these
last pages I feel not only emotionally distraught, but also as if there is a
part of me missing even though I know that I have gained so much from reading Night. It’s a book that will stick with
me forever- one that I won’t soon forget. Night
has opened up my eyes and I realize now why Elie Wiesel would wish for his
story to always be known. It is incredibly important for humans to understand
the evils that they can produce.
In the last 40
pages or so of Night all of the
victims are more exhausted than ever. Basically any hope that still remained
was quickly thrown out the window with the sad realization that in most of
their cases, there was not going to be a happy ending because even if they did
survive they would never overcome the trauma that comes with surviving. At one
point in the story, Elie Wiesel even expressed his lack of hope when he said, “Suddenly,
the evidence overwhelmed me: there was no longer any reason to live, any reason
to fight.” (99). Like I said before, Wiesel was not the only one to feel this
way – many others did too; at one point a person asked, “Why don’t they just
shoot us now?” (103). Faith no longer existed in the concentration camps. In
addition to this, one of the main conflicts in the last part of Night was between Elie Wiesel and his
father on whether or not Wiesel’s father should keep battling to survive. Wiesel
would do anything to keep his father alive, but his father wished otherwise and
just wanted to give up because it became too agonizing.
Lastly, I must
discuss the savagery that was uncovered in the camps and Wiesel’s darker
feelings on his father’s death. First off, as the end neared for the victims of
the concentration camps, many people became vicious and walked all over other
humans to survive. An “every man for himself” theme started to apply when
savage instincts kicked in. At one part of the story, when many of the people haven’t
eaten in several days, a father and a son were given some bread and Elie Wiesel
described the aftermath, “His son searched him, took the crust of bread, and
began to devour it. He didn’t get far. Two men had been watching him. They jumped
him. Others joined in. when they withdrew there were two dead bodies next to
me, the father and the son.” (101-102). I had to read this short passage over a
few times just to digest what I had actually just read. Humans resorted to
murdering a father and his son – with their bare hands – over a piece of bread
to keep themselves alive. This had my mind racing. What would I do in this
scenario? Would I or anyone I know today, resort to this savage nature? What
would be more important: surviving or keeping my morals intact? I’m not sure if
I can even answer these questions because I have never been faced with a
similar scenario.
Towards the end of Night Elie Wiesel explains that the
Rabbi’s son knew that he was running further from his father and purposefully
putting a gap between the two even though he knew his father might’ve died
because he was weak. After this, Wiesel pledges to never be like the Rabbi’s
son and abandon his father when he says, “Oh God, Master of the Universe, give
me the strength never to do what Rabbi Elihau’s son has done.” (91) Ironically,
when Elie Wiesel’s father is on his death bed, the Blockalteste explains
something to him, “In this place, it is every man for himself, and you cannot
think of others. Not even your father. In this place, there is no such thing as
father, brother, friend. Each of us lives and dies alone.” (110). Sure enough,
Wiesel ends up ignoring his father’s last wishes; even when he is desperately being
summoned to his father’s deathbed. Elie Wiesel let his savagery get the best of
him and he gave into his “id” desires and ignored his father to spare himself.
Although it seems awful, I have to ask myself, would I do the same thing if I was
in such a fragile state? So, I ask you, reader, do you know what you would have done?
Would you have given into the id desires like Wiesel? Although you think you
may now the answer, the truth is you do not because you will never know how you
would react until you are placed in the same situation.
Here's more information on ego/superego/id
http://psychology.about.com/od/theoriesofpersonality/a/personalityelem.htm
I agree with you fully. The end of this memoir is too powerful to describe. The fact that human beings can perform such acts on their own kind is unimaginable. It is important for people, especially our generation, to know what has happened, to see the darker side of our history.
ReplyDeleteThe end of the book definitely shows how much hope is lost, and how long gone the victims' faith is. I myself was genuinely surprised that Mr. Wiesel kept up his hope for that long. With the conditions that he and his father endured, I was truly amazed at how long Elie kept up his hope that they would survive.
As to the "every man for themselves" philosophy, people will never know how they react in that situation. Thin k about it this way: if you saw someone with a piece of food, and you knew that you wouldn't get any food for days, wouldn't you want that food? People may refute the fact that they would react in the same way as some of the men in the book, but you have to admit that humans are selfish creatures. We only want to please ourselves. People resort to that Id part of them in order to survive. It may have been a hopeless cause there, they may have died anyway, but they still had to try, didn't they?
I believe that even if you have resorted to a savage and frail state, you still feel the need to help your own family. Yet, when they want you to do something for them, and you see it as necessary to ignore in order for you to survive, then maybe, just maybe, you must ignore your family. It's a hard realization, but realizing the hardest life lessons is part of maturing. Everyone must go through it, no matter their situation.